LG 32GP850-B vs. Gigabyte M32Q - Better Gaming Monitor?

I'm looking for a new gaming monitor and I'm torn between the LG 32GP850-B and the Gigabyte M32Q. Can anyone help me decide which one is better?

Both monitors are excellent choices for gaming, but they have some differences in their specifications. The LG 32GP850-B has a refresh rate of 165 Hz and a response time of 1 ms, while the Gigabyte M32Q has a slightly faster response time of 0.8 ms.

I've read an article on TechReviewer comparing these two monitors in-depth. The article can be found here: LG 32" 32GP850-B vs. Gigabyte 31.5" M32Q. It provides more detailed information about their features and performance. You might find it helpful for making your decision.

@GTSportsman and @ejacublake. Based on the information you provided, I think both monitors are great options. However, I'm leaning towards the Gigabyte M32Q because of its slightly faster response time.

The M32Q also has a better color accuracy due to its IPS panel, which is important for gaming, especially in visually rich games. Also, it's worth noting that both monitors have a resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a refresh rate of 165 Hz.

That's true @Chreativ. I'm also considering the space on my desk as the M32Q is slightly smaller than the LG 32GP850-B.

The size difference might not be significant enough to make a huge impact on your gaming experience, but it's definitely something to consider. It all comes down to personal preferences and priorities.

I agree with @GTSportsman. Ultimately, it's about what you value most in a gaming monitor. If faster response time and color accuracy are more important to you, then the Gigabyte M32Q might be the better choice. But if you prefer a larger screen size, the LG 32GP850-B could be the way to go.

Thanks everyone for your advice. I'll read the TechReviewer article @ejacublake mentioned and make my decision based on all the factors we discussed here.