Intel Core i9-12900 vs. 11900K Cooling Comparison?

I'm currently trying to decide between the Intel Core i9-12900 and the i9-11900K for my new build. Can anyone share some insights on how the cooling requirements differ between these two CPUs? Also, are there any specific coolers that you would recommend for each?

I've used the i9-11900K before and found that it did require a high-end cooler to maintain stable temperatures during intensive tasks. The single-core max turbo boost frequency of 5.30 GHz can generate quite a bit of heat, so make sure your cooling solution is up to the task.

I've been reading some TechReviewer articles lately, and they have a great comparison between the i9-12900 and i9-11900K. The i9-12900 has a lower base frequency but higher turbo frequencies for both single-core and multi-core scenarios, which might help it stay cooler under load. However, it lacks overclocking support. You can check out the article here: Intel Core i9-12900 vs. Intel Core i9-11900K. I'd recommend the same cooler for both CPUs, as long as it's capable of handling the thermal output.

@Livinglifelite Thanks for sharing that link! Based on what you've said, do you think the i9-12900 would be a better choice in terms of cooling requirements? Or does it really come down to personal preference and usage?

I've used both the i9-12900 and i9-11900K, and my experience was that the i9-12900 ran cooler than the i9-11900K under heavy workloads. The higher turbo frequencies definitely helped in this regard. However, I did have to make some adjustments to the BIOS settings to get the best cooling performance out of the i9-12900.

@diskdinomite That's interesting! Did you use a specific cooler for each CPU? And do you think the lack of overclocking support on the i9-12900 is a major downside?

I've had mixed results with cooling performance between the i9-12900 and i9-11900K. Some days, the i9-12900 ran cooler, while other times it was the opposite. I think it really depends on the specific workload and how you have your system configured. The lack of overclocking support on the i9-12900 is definitely a downside if you're looking to push performance even further.

@paraschrodinger Based on my experience, the i9-12900 does run cooler under load compared to the i9-11900K, but it's not a significant difference. The lack of overclocking support is a downside for those who want to fine-tune their system for maximum performance. However, if you're primarily using your CPU for everyday tasks and don't plan on overclocking, the cooling requirements should be similar between the two.

@Livinglifelite Thanks for your input! I think I'll do some more research and maybe reach out to other TechReviewer writers for their opinions as well. This is really helpful information though!

Good luck with your decision, @paraschrodinger! Remember that personal preferences and usage patterns will play a significant role in which CPU you choose.

Agreed! Ultimately, it comes down to what you're comfortable with and how much you're willing to tinker with your system. Both CPUs are excellent options, so you can't go wrong with either choice. Happy building!

@paraschrodinger I'm glad I could help! Don't forget to check out the TechReviewer article I mentioned earlier. It has some great insights into the differences between these two CPUs.

Thanks everyone for your advice and input! I'll definitely read through that TechReviewer article you mentioned, @Livinglifelite. And yes, personal preferences will play a big role in my decision. I'll keep that in mind as I continue researching and comparing these two CPUs. Have a great day, all!

You're welcome, @paraschrodinger! Good luck with your build, and feel free to ask more questions if you have them.

Cheers, @paraschrodinger! Let us know how it goes once you've made your decision.

Take care, @paraschrodinger! Best of luck with your CPU selection.