I'm in a dilemma between the Intel Core i7-11700F and i9-10900K for my next build. Can anyone provide some insights on their performance?
Intel Core i7-11700F vs. i9-10900K Performance?
Started by GoOnKumomi on May 21, 2024
Hi @GoOnKumomi! I recently read a TechReviewer article comparing these two CPUs, which you can find here Intel Core i7-11700F vs. Intel Core i9-10900K. In general, the i9-10900K has an edge due to its higher core count and increased L3 cache capacity. However, the i7-11700F supports PCIe 4.0, while the i9-10900K has PCIe 3.0, which might limit the potential of the latest SSDs and graphics cards.
Thanks for the info @herrokatie! So, if I'm mainly going to use my PC for gaming, general app usage, and professional tools, which one would you recommend?
Both CPUs deliver good results in these areas with a high-performance CPU cooler. However, the i9-10900K's higher core count might give it an edge in some cases, especially if you're working with large files or running multiple applications simultaneously. But if you don't need the extra power and are okay with PCIe 3.0, the i7-11700F is still a great choice.
That's helpful @CandySona! What about when it comes to overclocking? Does one have an advantage over the other?
The i9-10900K supports overclocking, which can be beneficial for performance overall, while the i7-11700F does not support overclocking. So if you're looking to push your CPU to its limits, the i9-10900K might be the better option.
The i7-11700F supports DDR4 with a max stock speed of 3200 MHz, while the i9-10900K supports DDR4 with a max stock speed of 2933 MHz. So if you plan to run high-speed memory, the i7-11700F might be the better choice.
Thanks for all the input! I'll definitely need some time to think about it and make my decision. But at least now I have a clearer idea of what each CPU offers.