Intel Core i5-14600 vs. Intel Core i9-12900F

Started by Saintsnapalm on May 21, 2024

I'm looking to buy a new CPU and I'm torn between the Intel Core i5-14600 and the Intel Core i9-12900F. Any advice on which one would be better for gaming, general apps, and professional tools?

Solved by Saintsnapalm in post #12
Alright, that's a lot to take in. Thanks everyone for your input! I'll definitely read the TechReviewer article Intel Core i5-14600 vs. Intel Core i9-12900F you mentioned, @ManicPixieDreams, and see if it clarifies things further.

Both CPUs are great choices, but if you're looking for more performance overall, the i9-12900F might be the way to go. I've been using it for a while now and it's impressive. Check out this TechReviewer article Intel Core i5-14600 vs. Intel Core i9-12900F for a detailed comparison between these two processors.

Thanks @ManicPixieDreams. That's really helpful! The article you linked seems quite informative. But I'm still curious about the differences in terms of core types, frequencies, and cache capacities. Can anyone elaborate on that?

Sure, @Saintsnapalm, both CPUs have their own strengths. The i5-14600 has 6 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores, while the i9-12900F has 8 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores. In terms of base frequencies, the i5-14600 has a 2.70 GHz P-core frequency, while the i9-12900F has a slightly lower 2.40 GHz P-core frequency.

That's interesting! So what about single-core turbo frequencies and L3 cache capacities? I've heard these factors play a significant role in performance as well.

You're right, @Nanomachines-Son. The i5-14600 has a 5.20 GHz single-core max turbo boost frequency, while the i9-12900F has a slightly lower but still impressive 5.10 GHz single-core max turbo boost frequency. As for L3 cache capacities, the i5-14600 has a 24 MB cache, and the i9-12900F has a more substantial 30 MB cache.

Wow, that's quite a difference in cache size! So how does this impact performance in general apps and professional tools?

The larger L3 cache on the i9-12900F can definitely provide better performance for memory-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering. However, both CPUs should handle most general apps and professional tools well.

I've noticed that the i5-14600 doesn't support overclocking, which might be a downside if you're looking to push your CPU to its limits.

True, @lyfebyhomer. On the other hand, the i9-12900F also doesn't support overclocking. So it seems neither CPU has that option.

That's correct. Both CPUs support DDR5 with max stock speeds of 5600 MHz and 4800 MHz for the i5-14600 and i9-12900F, respectively. The i9-12900F also supports PCIe 5.0, which can be beneficial when using fast SSDs and graphics cards.

Alright, that's a lot to take in. Thanks everyone for your input! I'll definitely read the TechReviewer article Intel Core i5-14600 vs. Intel Core i9-12900F you mentioned, @ManicPixieDreams, and see if it clarifies things further.

Solution

You're welcome, @Saintsnapalm. Good luck with your decision!