Intel Core i5-14400 vs. i3-14100F Performance Comparison?

I recently came across the new Intel Core i5-14400 and the Core i3-14100F, and I'm trying to decide which one would be better for my upcoming projects. Can anyone provide insights on their performance?

Both CPUs are from Intel's 12th generation, but the i5-14400 has more cores and a larger L3 cache than the i3-14100F, which should make it perform better in general. Have you checked out TechReviewer's article comparing these two CPUs? Intel Core i5-14400 vs. Intel Core i3-14100F

Thanks for pointing that out! The article seems to confirm what I was thinking, but could anyone share personal experiences with either of these processors?

I've been using the i5-14400 for a few months now, and I must say it's fantastic. The additional cores really help when running multiple applications simultaneously or doing some heavy lifting in terms of multitasking.

@ethinker That's interesting! I've also used the i3-14100F recently, and while it performs decently for everyday tasks, I noticed a slight bottleneck when trying to run resource-intensive programs like video editing software.

That makes sense. So it seems that if I'm doing more multitasking or running heavy applications, the i5-14400 would be the better choice?

@MikiRawr Exactly! The i5-14400 has a clear edge in performance for such tasks. But if you're mostly using your computer for lighter applications and don't need the extra power, the i3-14100F should suffice.

It's important to consider your specific needs when choosing between these two CPUs. The TechReviewer article Intel Core i5-14400 vs. Intel Core i3-14100F offers a more in-depth analysis of their performance differences, so I recommend giving it a read for a comprehensive understanding.