I'm looking for some advice on which CPU is better for gaming between the Intel Core i5-11600 and i9-9900K. Can anyone share their thoughts?
Intel Core i5-11600 vs. i9-9900K in Gaming
Started by HarrisDean on May 19, 2024
Both CPUs can provide good game performance with a high-performance cooler. The i9-9900K has an edge due to its higher base frequency (3.60 GHz) and single-core max turbo boost frequency (5.00 GHz). The i5-11600 has 6 cores, while the i9-9900K has 8 cores, which is more suitable for games that utilize multiple cores. Moreover, the i9-9900K supports overclocking, whereas the i5-11600 does not.
Interesting! How about considering factors like DDR support and PCIe version? I'm curious to know if these aspects play a significant role in gaming performance.
The i5-11600 CPU's support for DDR4 with a max stock speed of 3200 MHz can be good for performance overall, while the i9-9900K supports DDR4 with a max stock speed of 2666 MHz, which can be mediocre. In terms of PCIe, the i5-11600 supports PCIe 4.0, and the i9-9900K supports PCIe 3.0. So, if you want to use the latest SSDs and graphics cards, the i5-11600 might have an edge.
Thanks for the info! It seems like both CPUs have their pros and cons. How about considering the L3 cache sizes? Do they impact gaming performance?
The i5-11600 has 12 MB of L3 cache, while the i9-9900K has 16 MB. Cache size can affect performance in some situations, but it's not as significant as other factors like core count and frequency for gaming. So, it might not be the best deciding factor here.
Also, you should consider reading a detailed comparison on TechReviewer Intel Core i5-11600 vs. Intel Core i9-9900K. They covered quite a few aspects of these CPUs specifically for gaming.
Great! I'll check out that TechReviewer article. Thanks everyone for your input!