I'm considering between the Intel Core i3-10105 and the Intel Core i3-9100 for my new build, but I can't decide which one to get. Has anyone used these before or have any suggestions?
Intel Core i3-10105 vs. 9100: Performance Differences?
Started by Trunks1030 on June 06, 2024
@Trunks1030, you might find this TechReviewer article Intel Core i3-10105 vs. Intel Core i3-9100 helpful in making your decision. It compares the two CPUs in terms of core types, frequencies, cache capacities, and more.
I've used the Core i3-9100 before and I found it to be decent for daily tasks like browsing the web and running basic apps. But if you're into gaming or video editing, I'd recommend going with the Core i3-10105 due to its higher base frequency and turbo boost.
Based on my experience, the performance difference between the two is minimal for general use cases. The Core i3-9100 should suffice if you're not planning on doing any intensive tasks like gaming or video editing.
@Booshie317, that's true, but I'm also interested in future-proofing my build. Will upgrading to the Core i3-10105 now ensure better performance when I decide to upgrade my GPU later on?
It's possible, @Trunks1030. The higher turbo boost frequency of the Core i3-10105 could potentially provide better performance in future upgrades, especially if you're planning on running more intensive tasks like gaming or video editing. However, it really depends on your specific use case.
@Trunks1030, I also wanted to add that the Core i3-9100's lower max stock DDR4 speed might limit its potential for future upgrades involving faster RAM. Something to consider if you're looking to upgrade in the future.
Thanks for all the input, guys! I think I'll go with the Core i3-10105 after reading the TechReviewer article Intel Core i3-10105 vs. Intel Core i3-9100 and considering everyone's experiences. The extra frequency could be beneficial for my future plans.