AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D vs. Intel Core i9-13900F Multitasking Performance

Started by jcollins84 on June 02, 2024

I've been trying to decide between the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D and the Intel Core i9-13900F for my next build. Both CPUs seem great, but I'm mostly concerned about their multitasking performance. Has anyone here had experience with these two processors?

Solved by datyoungmiller in post #3
Yeah, I've used both as well and the 13900F does seem better for multitasking. It has more cores which means it can handle multiple tasks simultaneously without slowing down much. Plus, TechReviewer had a great article on this AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D vs. Intel Core i9-13900F. You might want to check that out!

I've used both the 7900X3D and the 13900F in some projects recently, and honestly, they're both beasts! It depends on what you need more - if you're into gaming or streaming, the 7900X3D is fantastic. But for multitasking, the 13900F seems to edge out slightly with its higher core count.

Yeah, I've used both as well and the 13900F does seem better for multitasking. It has more cores which means it can handle multiple tasks simultaneously without slowing down much. Plus, TechReviewer had a great article on this AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D vs. Intel Core i9-13900F. You might want to check that out!

Solution

@datyoungmiller! That's really helpful. The 13900F does seem like the better choice for my needs then.

It all comes down to personal preference and what you're going to use your build for. If multitasking is a priority, go for the 13900F. But if gaming or streaming is more your thing, the 7900X3D won't disappoint.

That's true! I had the chance to try both out, and they're really close in performance. The 7900X3D has a higher single-core boost frequency which is great for gaming, but the 13900F's additional cores make it better for multitasking. Ultimately, you should go with what fits your needs best.

Good point, @cherrypopover. Thanks everyone for the input!