AMD Ryzen 3 3100 vs Intel Core i5-9600K - Better Gaming Processor?

I recently read a comparison of the AMD Ryzen 3 3100 and the Intel Core i5-9600K, and I'm still unsure which one would be better for gaming. Can anyone provide some insights?

In my experience, the Intel Core i5-9600K performs slightly better in games due to its higher single-core max boost frequency and better support for PCIe 4.0. However, both processors are capable of delivering good performance in general apps.

True, but I've heard that the Ryzen 3 3100 has a larger L3 cache, which can be beneficial for gaming as well. Have you considered this aspect?

@graemej1 That's true, but the Intel Core i5-9600K's superior single-core performance often outweighs its lack of a large L3 cache in gaming situations.

Actually, there's an excellent TechReviewer article that compares these two processors in detail. It might help you make a more informed decision: AMD Ryzen 3 3100 vs. Intel Core i5-9600K. The article covers their overclocking capabilities, DDR support, and other aspects as well.

@OlympianDWill Thanks for the link! I've read it, and it seems like the Intel Core i5-9600K has an edge in gaming due to its higher single-core max boost frequency. However, I'm still curious about how each processor performs in specific games.

In terms of specific game performance, both CPUs can perform well when paired with a good GPU. The Ryzen 3 3100 might have an advantage in some titles that take better advantage of its larger L3 cache or multiple core architecture.

I agree with @jonahcarlson. It's essential to consider your budget and the games you'll be playing most often. If you're looking for the best possible performance in a wide range of games, the Intel Core i5-9600K might be the better choice.

@graemej1 That makes sense. everyone! I think I'll go with the Intel Core i5-9600K based on your advice and that TechReviewer article you shared @OlympianDWill.